Also available at KansasCityLaw.tv In this video, Jason M. Kueser discusses typical causes of action in securities cases. These typical actions are: (1) fraud, (2) securities fraud, (3) breach of fiduciary duty, (4) breach of contract, (5) violation of state securities laws, (6) violation of federal securities laws, and (7) negligence.
This video is provided for informational purposes only and nothing contained herein is or should be constituted as legal advice. If you have questions related to any legal topic, you should consult with an attorney and should not rely solely upon information provided via the internet. The choice of an attorney is an important one and should not be based solely upon advertisements such as this website. Past results afford no guarantee of future results. Every case is different and must be judged on its own merits. *Any information submitted via this website may not be secure and/or confidential. Merely contacting this firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship.
This video is provided for informational purposes only and nothing contained herein is or should be constituted as legal advice. If you have questions related to any legal topic, you should consult with an attorney and should not rely solely upon information provided via the internet. All content provided on this blog are subject to the Disclaimer at the bottom of the page.
How do attorneys decide which securities fraud cases to pursue?
Also available at KansasCityLaw.tv In this video, Jason M. Kueser discusses factors that securities fraud attorneys often evaluate in determining which cases to pursue. This often includes a number of factors, including (1) individual aspects of the customer and the customer’s situation; (2) the amount of investment loss suffered by the investor; (3) the type or types of investments involved; and (4) whether the stockbroker, adviser, or brokerage firm has previously regulatory issues. There are other factors that are involved, as well.
If you feel you have been the victim of investment fraud or securities fraud, please contact an attorney. If you would like to speak with The Kueser Law Firm, please call the firm at (816) 374-5865 or send us an href=”mailto:jason@jmkesquire.com&subject=Contact from Kueser Law Firm blog”>e-mail.
This video is provided for informational purposes only and nothing contained herein is or should be constituted as legal advice. If you have questions related to any legal topic, you should consult with an attorney and should not rely solely upon information provided via the internet. The choice of an attorney is an important one and should not be based solely upon advertisements such as this website. Past results afford no guarantee of future results. Every case is different and must be judged on its own merits. *Any information submitted via this website may not be secure and/or confidential. Merely contacting this firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship.
FINRA recently released its arbitration statistics for the month/year ended December 2010.
For the year, there were 20% fewer cases filed (5,680 v. 7,137 in 2009) and there were 6,241 cases closed (a 37% increase over 2009). Of these cases, 22% were resolved by arbitration hearing, 52% were resolved by direct settlement between the parties, 10% were resolved through mediation, and 16% of cases were either withdrawn or resolved through “other” method.
Results for investors also improved in 2010, as 47% cases that were decided by an arbitration panel resulted in an award of damages to the customer. This reflects a 2% increase over the results in 2009, and a 10% increase compared to arbitration claims decided by arbitration panels in 2007 — the worst year, for investors, in arbitration claims over the past six years.
The overall turnaround time for cases closed during the year also increased to 12.7 months (from 11.5 months in 2009). For cases that are resolved after an arbitration hearing, the turnaround time increased to 15 months (from 14 months in 2009).
The most common claims in arbitration were: (1) Breach of Fiduciary Duty; (2) Negligence; (3) Fraud/Misrepresentation; (4) Failure to Supervise; and, (5) Breach of Contract. The most common type of securities involved in arbitration claims were mutual funds and common stocks.
The Kueser Law Firm represents investors in securities arbitration. If you feel that your investments have been mismanaged, please contact the firm to discuss your rights.
ProFunds Group, one of the largest issuers of leveraged and inverse ETFs recently issued a warning that some of its leveraged and inverse ETFs may not be suitable for all investors. In the prospectus dated October 1, 2009, the company repeatedly states:
The Fund is different from most exchangetraded funds in that it seeks leveraged returns and only on a daily basis. The Fund also is riskier than similarly benchmarked exchange-traded funds that do not use leverage. Accordingly, the Fund may not be suitable for all investors and should be used only by knowledgeable investors who understand the potential consequences of seeking daily leveraged investment results. Shareholders should actively monitor their investments.
(See, e.g., prospectus at pp. 49, 54, 59, 64, 69, 74, 79.)
While additional disclosures are an improvement, this disclosure is still somewhat vague. It is similar to telling someone that an investment is suitable for them if they are seeking growth of their investment. Whoisn’t seeking growth of their investments? I have never heard anyone say “I am looking for an investment that will cause me to lose money.”
In addition, many investors who are sold leveraged ETFs such as these never receive a copy of the prospectus. If an investor does not receive the prospectus, the disclosure does not protect them (however, it could protect the fund company from liability).
Leveraged ETFs invest their shareholders’ money in futures and/or derivatives in order to multiply the daily return of an index. Some leveraged ETFs seek a return that is 200% or even 300% of the daily performance of the index. Inverse ETFs work in much the same way, except that these funds seek a return that is equal to 100%, 200%, or even 300% of the opposite of the daily performance of the index. With these funds, an investor actually profits when the index declines in value. Typical leveraged ETFs and inverse ETFs reset each day and therefore, over periods longer than one day, their performance can vary considerably from the index. In addition to ProFunds, the most popular leveraged ETFs and inverse ETFs are managed by Rydex and Direxion.
FINRA has already declared that leveraged ETFs are typically unsuitable for retail investors. Therefore, the announcement by ProFunds is not a revelation. If your stockbroker or financial advisor has sold you any leveraged ETFs or inverse ETFs, or purchased any leveraged ETFs or inverse ETFs in your accounts, you may be entitled to recover any losses on these investments. The Kueser Law Firm represents investors who were sold leveraged ETFs and inverse ETFs. If you are concerned that your investments have been mismanaged, contact us to learn more about your rights.
According to a recent article on InvestmentNews.com, a study commissioned by Charles Schwab revealed that a significant percentage of investors are unaware of the losses sustained in their accounts. To make matters worse, more than one-third of the investors surveyed did not know which mutual funds they owned and less than one-third spoke with their financial advisor or stockbroker on a regular basis.
In the article, a Charles Schwab executive was quoted as stating that “some investors tend to be overwhelmed or intimidated by investing.” This is interesting because it confirms the important role that stockbrokers and financial advisors play in investors’ financial decisions. While this seems elementary, it astonishes me as to how many broker-dealers take the position in arbitration cases that the stockbroker or financial adviser played a passive role in the losses sustained in the investor’s accounts.
The survey also reported that 60% of the investors surveyed do not plan to make any changes to their investment allocations following the stock market’s rapid post-September descent. Stockbrokers and financial advisers often tell their clients to “stay the course.” In addition (or alternatively), many advisers and stockbrokers will show their clients charts or other documents that show how following a decline in the stock market a large portion of the recovery often occurs on select days — thus reinforcing their recommendation to stay the course, otherwise taking the risk that the investor will miss those few opportunities to participate in the recovery. Following this recommendation, clients feel forced to hold the same investments that created their losses.
It is important not to ignore losses in your investment accounts for many reasons, including but not limited to the following:
1. It is more difficult to recover from a significant loss than it is to sustain the loss in the first place. For example, if you start with $100,000 in an investment account and you sustain losses of 50%, the value of your account would be $50,000. Therefore, you would need a gain of 100% of this reduced amount ($50,000) in order to recover from the 50% loss you sustained.
2. If you are sustaining losses that cause you to lose sleep (or suffer other emotional distress), your investment accounts are probably invested in an unsuitable manner. This is something that you need to discuss with your stockbroker or financial adviser. If your adviser is unwilling to make significant changes to the accounts, or worse yet, if the stockbroker tries to reassure you that the investments are appropriate, you should seek a second opinion. In addition, you may want to consult with a securities attorney to discuss whether you have a legal claim.
3. If you decide to file a claim related to your losses, any failure to act could reduce or diminish your ability to succeed in arbitration or litigation. Whenever legal action is initiated, there are several issues related to the timing of the investor’s actions and the claim itself that must be considered (including statutes of limiations, equitable defenses, and arbitration eligibility rules).
When a stockbroker or financial adviser makes a recommendation to his or her client, they (and the firms they represent) may be liable for losses resulting from the recommendation. The Kueser Law Firm represents investors in securities arbitration. If you are concerned that your investments have been mismanaged, contact us to learn more about your rights.
In a recent article published on Law.com, Sarah S. Gold and Richard L. Spinogatti conduct a thorough analysis of the issues in In re Merck & Co. Secs. Deriv. & ERISA Litig.., a Third Circuit Court of Appeals case. The Supreme Court granted certiorari in In re Merck to resolve when an investor is on inquiry notice of a potential fraud claim for purposes of determining when the statute of limitaions begins to run..
The authors note that in In re Merck, the Third Circuit held that “an investor is not on inquiry notice of a potential fraud claim until the investor has knowledge of a possible fraud, including scienter.” The authors also note that the Ninth Circuit recently came to a similar conclusion in Betz v. Trainer Wortham & Co., for which a certiorari petition is currently pending.
The article is a good read for anyone interested in securities fraud litigation.
The choice of an attorney is an important one and should not be based solely upon advertisements such as this website. Past results afford no guarantee of future results. Every case is different and must be judged on its own merits.
*Any information submitted via this website may not be secure and/or confidential. Merely contacting this firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship.
In May 2010, a civil racketeering lawsuit was filed accusing a group of people associated with a New York investment firm of stealing millions of dollars from investors. The allegation was almost commonplace; the response was anything but.See all stories on this topic » […]
It is seeking out investment partners and looking to vote in a new board in April. However, law-enforcement agencies in Japan, Britain and the United States are still investigating the fraud at the multinational which, according to the third-party ...See all stories on this topic » […]
The savvy young investor with a reputation for living the good life is now a fugitive from federal prosecution. But prosecutors do know the whereabout of Wilson's younger brother, who is charged as a relatively small figure in the scam.See all stories on this topic » […]
All advisers should be up-to-date on the latest cyberscams, frauds and schemes. • Never respond to e-mail correspondence from one of your investment providers by clicking on a link and entering a password. Legitimate requests for sensitive information ...See all stories on this topic » […]
Therefore, it is important to know how to spot a potential investment scam. Cold-Calling: How To Spot an Investment Fraud By: Debra Speyer www.wallstreetfraudblog.com While the National Do Not Call Registry has certainly reduced the number of sales ...See all stories on this topic » […]
Christian Baker, 36, was sentenced in US District Court in Missoula Friday after pleading guilty last August to wire fraud/investment fraud. According to federal agents, Baker had been in the “business” of raising capital for investment ventures for a ...See all stories on this topic » […]
The Security and Exchange Commission issued an investor alert on Jan. 4, cautioning investors to be better aware of fraudulent investments schemes that may involve social media. While social media outlets such as Facebook, You Tube, Twitter, ...See all stories on this topic » […]
Baker previously pleaded guilty to fraud. Prosecutors say he received about $3 million from a variety of investors, with about one-third being returned to them, one-third being invested and the other third converted to his own use.See all stories on this topic » […]
The ringleader of a $2.2 million mortgage fraud ring was sentenced this week to six years in prison and ordered to repay nearly $1 million to two companies. Michael Hudalla, 45, of Mendota Heights, who pleaded guilty to two counts of racketeering, ...See all stories on this topic » […]
By Terri Langford Millions of investor dollars flowed from a Caribbean bank to a Swiss account controlled by R. Allen Stanford, and from there to his numerous businesses in the US and elsewhere, a key witness testified Friday in Stanford's fraud trial.See all stories on this topic » […]
"The goal of civil litigation is to seek culpable pockets and recover from those pockets," said Frenkel, a partner at Shulman Rogers in Potomac, Md., and a former enforcement lawyer at the Securities and Exchange Commission. Cleveland securities lawyer ...See all stories on this topic »Plain Dealer […]
Student Loan Corp. in September 2010 told the US Securities and Exchange Commission in a public filing that it was taking a $900 million charge, just days after it announced was being sold, according to the complaint. The lender became a wholly-owned ...See all stories on this topic » […]
Morrison held that Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 did not provide a private cause of action in “foreign-cubed” cases—cases where foreign plaintiffs sue foreign defendants for misconduct in connection with securities traded on ...See all stories on this topic » […]
27, 2012, in Washington, regarding a fraud unit that will investigate residential mortgage-backed securities. By Mark Wilson, Getty Images New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman speaks at a Justice Department news conference on Jan.See all stories on this topic »USA TODAY […]
Investors allege securities fraud, while futures customers file claims under commodity and US racketeering law, they said. Exchange CME Group Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co., banker to MF Global, are named in futures customer suits, they said.See all stories on this topic » […]
By granting exemptions to laws and regulations that act as a deterrent to securities fraud, the SEC has let financial giants like JPMorganChase, Goldman Sachs and Bank of America continue to have advantages reserved for the most dependable companies, ...See all stories on this topic »New York Times […]
The Securities and Exchange Commision accused four former Credit Suisse employees of civil fraud. Three were named in related criminal charges, and two pleaded guilty to those. The most senior of the defendants has not settled with the government.See all stories on this topic » […]
M. Davis, center, and his attorney David Finn are surrounded by media as they leave the federal courthouse after pleading guilty to three counts: conspiracy to commit mail, wire and securities fraud; mail fraud and conspiracy to obstruct a Securities ...See all stories on this topic » […]
Motorola Solutions Inc. will pay $200 million to settle a 2007 securities fraud lawsuit brought by shareholders. Attorneys representing the shareholders disclosed the proposed settlement Thursday evening, which was also filed with a federal court in ...See all stories on this topic »Chicago Tribune […]
Motorola Solutions Inc. has settled a 2007 securities fraud lawsuit brought by shareholders for $200 million. More details to come.See all stories on this topic » […]
