<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Investment Fraud Blawg : by Kansas City Missouri Securities Fraud Lawyer The Kueser Law Firm &#187; Class Action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.investmentfraudblog.com/category/class-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.investmentfraudblog.com</link>
	<description>A Blog For Investors and Financial Professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:33:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What Guidance Will SCOTUS Give on the Statute of Limitations in Securities Cases?</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentfraudblog.com/2009/06/12/what-guidance-will-scotus-give-on-the-statute-of-limitations-in-securities-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.investmentfraudblog.com/2009/06/12/what-guidance-will-scotus-give-on-the-statute-of-limitations-in-securities-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason M. Kueser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Class Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statute of Limitations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentfraudblog.com/2009/06/12/what-guidance-will-scotus-give-on-the-statute-of-limitations-in-securities-cases/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent article published on Law.com, Sarah S. Gold and Richard L. Spinogatti conduct a thorough analysis of the issues in In re Merck &#38; Co. Secs. Deriv. &#38; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/ihc/PubArticleIHC.jsp?id=1202431372080" target="_blank" title="Law.com: Revisiting the Limitations Period for Securities Fraud">article</a> published on <a href="http://www.law.com/" target="_blank" title="Law.com">Law.com</a>, Sarah S. Gold and Richard L. Spinogatti conduct a thorough analysis of the issues in <em>In re Merck &amp; Co. Secs. Deriv. &amp; ERISA Litig..</em>, a Third Circuit Court of Appeals case. The Supreme Court granted certiorari in <em>In re Merck</em> to resolve when an investor is on inquiry notice of a potential fraud claim for purposes of determining when the statute of limitaions begins to run..</p>
<p>The authors note that in <em>In re Merck</em>, the Third Circuit held that &#8220;an investor is not on inquiry notice of a potential fraud claim until the investor has knowledge of a possible fraud, including scienter.&#8221; The authors also note that the Ninth Circuit recently came to a similar conclusion in <em>Betz v. Trainer Wortham &amp; Co</em>., for which a certiorari petition is currently pending.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/ihc/PubArticleIHC.jsp?id=1202431372080" target="_blank" title="Law.com">article</a> is a good read for anyone interested in securities fraud litigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.investmentfraudblog.com/2009/06/12/what-guidance-will-scotus-give-on-the-statute-of-limitations-in-securities-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stifel Nicolaus Agrees to Repurchase Auction Rate Securities &#8212; In 3 Years</title>
		<link>http://www.investmentfraudblog.com/2009/04/22/stifel-nicolaus-agrees-to-repurchase-auction-rate-securities-in-3-years/</link>
		<comments>http://www.investmentfraudblog.com/2009/04/22/stifel-nicolaus-agrees-to-repurchase-auction-rate-securities-in-3-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason M. Kueser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Auction Rate Securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Kueser Law Firm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investmentfraudblog.com/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On April 9, 2009, Stifel Nicolaus &#38; Co. announced that they had planned to repurchase their clients&#8217; auction rate securities (ARS).  Unfortunately, for their customers, the repurchase will not be completed for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>On April 9, 2009, Stifel Nicolaus &amp; Co. <a title="Stifel ARS Settlement" href="http://www2.stifel.com/docs/pdf/pressreleases/2009/ARS_20090409.pdf" target="_blank">announced</a> that they had planned to repurchase their clients&#8217; auction rate securities (ARS).  Unfortunately, for their customers, the repurchase will not be completed for more than three years. Furthermore, the settlement does not require <a title="Stifel Nicolaus &amp; Co." href="http://www.stifel.com" target="_blank">Stifel</a> to repurchase any ARS for more than 14 months.  The terms of the settlement, if accepted, provides that Stifel will repurchase its customers&#8217; ARS on the following schedule:</p>
<ul>
<li>The greater of 10% or $25,000 to be completed by June 30, 2010;</li>
<li>The greater of 10% or $25,000 to be completed by June 30, 2011;</li>
<li>The balance of outstanding ARS to be repurchased by June 30, 2012.</li>
</ul>
<p>Stifel Nicolaus is a defendant in a <a title="Stifel Nicolaus ARS Class Action" href="http://securities.stanford.edu/1040/SF_01/" target="_blank">class action</a> lawsuit related to its sale of ARS to customers.  In addition, the Missouri Secretary of State and Attorney General <a title="Missouri files civil action against Stifel" href="http://www.sos.mo.gov/securities/news.asp?nID=792" target="_blank">filed a civil action</a> against Stifel for its sale of ARS to customers.  </p>
<p>If you were sold ARS by Stifel Nicolaus, you should contact an attorney to discuss how this settlement, and the pending lawsuits impact your rights.  <a title="The Kueser Law Firm" href="http://www.jmkesquire.com" target="_blank">The Kueser Law Firm</a> represents investors who have been defrauded by financial advisors, stockbrokers, banks, and other investment professionals.  </p>
<p>Because of the significant impact this settlement may have on your financial situation, if you do not <a title="Contact the Kueser Law Firm" href="http://www.jmkesquire.com/html/contact_us.html" target="_blank">contact The Kueser Law Firm</a>, you should contact an attorney to discuss your rights.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.investmentfraudblog.com/2009/04/22/stifel-nicolaus-agrees-to-repurchase-auction-rate-securities-in-3-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

